<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Owning Rails 2.0 Cookies at OWASP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.phishme.com/2007/11/owning-rails-20-cookies-at-owasp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.phishme.com/2007/11/owning-rails-20-cookies-at-owasp/</link>
	<description>Posts about innovative phishing ploys, social engineering techniques, and the latest hacks.  PhishMe is your one stop blog for the latest in anti-phishing and security news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 10:16:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: b3nn</title>
		<link>http://blog.phishme.com/2007/11/owning-rails-20-cookies-at-owasp/comment-page-1/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>b3nn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 00:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.phishme.com/2007/11/owning-rails-20-cookies-at-owasp/#comment-69</guid>
		<description>Sorry, updated the link for &#8220;cookie_store.rb&#8221; which did take you to an older version of the file. Brute forcing the HMAC is still possible. I&#039;m sure there are cases where this type of session storage would make sense, but from a security stand point, it makes me nervous that this will be the default storage option. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, updated the link for &ldquo;cookie_store.rb&rdquo; which did take you to an older version of the file. Brute forcing the HMAC is still possible. I&#039;m sure there are cases where this type of session storage would make sense, but from a security stand point, it makes me nervous that this will be the default storage option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Kemper</title>
		<link>http://blog.phishme.com/2007/11/owning-rails-20-cookies-at-owasp/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Kemper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.phishme.com/2007/11/owning-rails-20-cookies-at-owasp/#comment-67</guid>
		<description>Please see my comment on Part II debunking the claim of brute-force attack. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please see my comment on Part II debunking the claim of brute-force attack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhishMe &#187; Owning Rails 2.0 Cookies at OWASP: Part II</title>
		<link>http://blog.phishme.com/2007/11/owning-rails-20-cookies-at-owasp/comment-page-1/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>PhishMe &#187; Owning Rails 2.0 Cookies at OWASP: Part II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.phishme.com/2007/11/owning-rails-20-cookies-at-owasp/#comment-62</guid>
		<description>[...] OWASP conference proved to be a great ground to bring up this topic of the proposed Rails 2.0 cookie storage [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] OWASP conference proved to be a great ground to bring up this topic of the proposed Rails 2.0 cookie storage [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: higB</title>
		<link>http://blog.phishme.com/2007/11/owning-rails-20-cookies-at-owasp/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>higB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 10:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.phishme.com/2007/11/owning-rails-20-cookies-at-owasp/#comment-61</guid>
		<description>Great find Corey! Maybe it&#039;s not too late for this to be reconsidered. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great find Corey! Maybe it&#039;s not too late for this to be reconsidered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

