MITM TCP Tools « PhishMe

No Phishing Allowed

January 16

"You'll see the typical security geek saying, 'People are dumb, people are stupid, they're never going to be trained,'." said Rohyt Belani, PhishMe co-founder and CEO. "We have statistics to prove otherwise."
PhishMe Twitter
- Zappos customers, make sure you look out for phishing emails: http://t.co/xcavPbOs 03:51:21 PM January 26, 2012 from CoTweet Reply Retweet Favorite
- The importance of educating users to spot potential attacks is talked about in article about DoD ID card attack: http://t.co/jRnL7AXB 04:06:34 PM January 18, 2012 from CoTweet Reply Retweet Favorite
@phishme
Blogroll
Links
- Intrepidus Group
- Layered Security
Archives


	« SCADA hacking? What if they used phishme.com? RSA Conference: Circus of Vendors »


	MITM TCP Tools April 14th, 2008 by Mike Post moved here: http://intrepidusgroup.com/insight/2008/04/mitm-tcp-tools/ but really, just use mallory. Post is outdated. Cheers
	Tags: MITM, ssl, tcp This entry was posted on Monday, April 14th, 2008 at 9:24 am and is filed under Tools, Web Apps. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed. 1083 ResponsesMITM+TCP+Tools2008-04-14+14%3A24%3A58Mike to “MITM TCP Tools” Peter mcLaughlin says: July 4, 2008 at 4:29 am yep, I would be a consumer of such a tool. They are thin on the ground when it comes to fat client SSL MITM particlarly when whats wrapped up in the SSL is not a standard protocol. Would not mind a preview of POC? Saurabh Harit says: August 27, 2008 at 4:38 am Hi, This is exactly what I am looking for. I am currently pen testing a project which has a fat client. I am experiencing the same problems regarding proxy tools. I would highly appreciate if you could let me lay my hands on the PoC. My mail id is saurabh dot harit at gmail dot com. It will be a big help for me. I am also working towards developing similar tools but for this particular project, time is running out of my hands. Hope to hear from you. Thanks & Regards, Saurabh Harit Security Analyst Juicy says: November 6, 2009 at 5:47 am Does this apply to TLS connections as well? v2? v3? What browser/interface exposures have you tested against successfully (completed MitM successfully)?